Twenty-Six Percent?

According to a new report by Arizona’s conservative Goldwater Institute, Arizona’s high school students are woefully ignorant of U.S. history and civics. By now, we’re all used to these kinds of studies, but one finding in particular stopped me in my tracks: The researchers found that only 26 percent of students surveyed could identify George Washington as the nation’s first president.
Twenty-six percent? Can that really be true? That finding just seems hard to swallow—though the media have apparently swallowed it whole.
Don’t get me wrong. I certainly do not think American students’ knowledge of civics and history is nearly what it should be. A report by Common Core pointed to very troubling gaps in high school students’ knowledge. But even in that report, 73 percent of high school students could identify George Washington as the commander of the Continental Army during the American Revolution. If they knew that, they presumably also know he was our first president.
So what gives? Who were these students in the Arizona Study? How many were English Language Learners? How many took the telephone survey seriously? Are Arizona high school students that much more ignorant than students in the nation as a whole? Are the open response questions used by the Goldwater Institute that much more difficult than the multiple choice questions employed by Common Core?
A finding as alarming as that should really trigger some reexamination of the Goldwater Institute study’s methodology. If it is indeed true that a full three quarters of high school students cannot name our first president, then the decline of civics and history education is even more severe than I thought. All the more reason, then, to reevaluate accountability systems that focus primarily on basic skills.
We have long had ample cause to believe we should dramatically improve civics and history education. But the Arizona study reinforces another point entirely. Americans are apparently willing to believe any bad news, however severe, about the sorry state of education or American youth. If a new study proclaimed that ninety percent of American high school students cannot write their own names, or that ninety-five percent cannot tie their shoes, newspapers would probably run with it.
It is always challenging to strike the right balance between urgency that inspires decisive action and alarmism that breeds hopelessness and disengagement. I certainly hope surveys of student knowledge promote broad national commitment to civics and history.
Sign up
Sign up for our e-newsletter on public school success.
Become a Facebook fan.
H1N1 FLU RESOURCES
Click here for resources to help the public education community prepare for the unlikely case of a flu pandemic.
Emerging Vision
On this website, educators, parents and policymakers from coast to coast are sharing what's already working in public schools--and sparking a national conversation about how to make it work for children in every school. Join the conversation! Learn more.
Visionaries
Click here to browse dozens of Public School Insights interviews with extraordinary education advocates, including:
New Stories
Featured Story
Opening the Door for a New Generation of Students
Built in 1898, John Spry School has served kindergarten through eighth-grade children from southwest Chicago’s Little Village community, where the majority of the population is bilingual, for many years. But historically many of Spry’s students would graduate in the 8th grade, get a job to help support their families, and never complete high school.
In 2003, former principal of Spry, Dr. Carlos Azcoitia, approached the District CEO about adding a high school to Spry, creating a comprehensive community school from preschool through secondary school. After getting the go-ahead, Azcoitia met with community members, parents, the local school council, teachers, and students to discuss the design of a shared community building with an innovative, “no failure” high school. Today, Spry’s Community Links High School, which serves a student population that is 100% Hispanic and over 93% free or reduced price lunch, is opening new doors for the area’s children. Read more
School/District Characteristics
Hot Topics
Blog Roll
- Boardbuzz
- Edwize
- NSDC Reflections
- Advancing the Teaching Profession
- Principals' Office
- Principal's Policy Blog
- ASCA Scene
- The Leading Source
- PDK Blog
- ASBO Intl.'s Economic Recovery Blog
- U.S. Department of Education Blog
- The Core Knowledge Blog
- This Week in Education
- PTA Blog
- Such a Smart Mom
- Eduwonkette
- Center for Public Education
- Connect for Kids
- Once Upon a School
- Teacher Leadership Today
- On the Shoulders of Giants
- Teacher in a Strange Land
- Teach Moore
- The Tempered Radical
- TLN Teacher Voices
- The Educated Reporter

Open response items are
Open response items are harder than multiple choice items so that can be the dfference between the Goldwater results and the common core result.
Also Arizona has a lot of ELL students who probably don't do phone surveys very well. the Goldwater institute says charters did better than publics and privates did better than charters and publics. It's also true that most low SES and ELL students are in normal public schools. Unlike most states, charters in Arizona have fewer low SES and ELL students than publics do. Privates have even less than charters, so that can be the reason for the differences.
Thanks for taking another
Thanks for taking another look at this story.
Just the fact that the results were divided into public, charter and private (and we didn't get to see exactly how much better the charter and private school samples did) makes me question the whole enterprise, let alone the sampling methodology. Ninety-five percent of the elementary school kids I taught could name the first president of the U.S. by 3rd grade. Unless they didn't speak English, of course.
Your analysis of the balance between stimulating the need to act and outright twisting of reality is right on. A steady diet of stories like this does not lead to thoughtful conversation about improving public education. The purpose of the story--and probably the "research"--was something else.
Thanks for your comment,
Thanks for your comment, Nancy.
As I understand the study, they did provide data for charter and private schools as well, and they found that charter school students did twice as well as publics, and privates did twice as well as charters. If Gary's claim that Arizona charters have fewer ELL students is true, that might account for part of the difference. Arizona privates presumably have fewer ELL students still.
Still, your experience of third graders seems more believable than the 26% figure. It would be interesting to ask teachers informally to determine how many of their students can name the first president. I can't shake my skepticism about the study's findings.
Post new comment