Throwing Out the Baby with the Bathwater

Read President Obama's budget, and you'll get the distinct sense that alternative certification works and staff development doesn't. The first of these gets a big shot in the arm, and the second (Title II) suffers a pretty big blow. Get the right people into the schools, the thinking seems to go, and the rest will sort itself out. But reality is more complicated than that. All roads will take us back to staff development.
Critics argue that federal staff development dollars haven't done much good, so why keep them flowing? Much better to funnel them into alternatives. The critics have a point, or maybe half a point. We haven't gotten enough bang for our federal buck, so it's tough to justify calls for more Title II money unless we can show that we will spend the money well. Of course, alt cert programs haven't yet proven their worth either, but they're newer, some are promising, and none carry the taint of "status quo."
But it would be very wrong to turn our backs on staff development because it has so often been botched in practice. Stephanie Hirsh of the National Staff Development Council offers another path. She recently worked with a teacher leader to craft a message to Arne Duncan. The upshot of that message: Direct Title II dollars more wisely.
First, they write, tie the use of funds to a much stronger definition of professional learning. (NSDC's definition has won widespread support.) Then set aside funds to help teacher leaders and principals learn how to "build and support collaborative learning teams and communities." Finally, require hard-nosed evaluation of the money's impact.
As we consider the fate of Title II dollars, we can draw an important lesson from the charter school debate. Good charter schools work, and bad ones don't. The same goes for staff development. The challenge, then, is to ensure that money supports quality. Any innovation, no matter how cool or sexy, will founder on poor implementation.
No school--and no teachers--will get very far without strong and sustained staff development. So let's not throw out the baby with the bathwater.
Sign up
Sign up for our e-newsletter on public school success.
Become a Facebook fan.
H1N1 FLU RESOURCES
Click here for resources to help the public education community prepare for the unlikely case of a flu pandemic.
Emerging Vision
On this website, educators, parents and policymakers from coast to coast are sharing what's already working in public schools--and sparking a national conversation about how to make it work for children in every school. Join the conversation! Learn more.
Visionaries
Click here to browse dozens of Public School Insights interviews with extraordinary education advocates, including:
New Stories
Featured Story

A Village Route to Early Childhood Education
In the 1990s, we at Davenport Community Schools noticed a trend: Children were coming to kindergarten unprepared to learn. A troublingly low number of our district’s children (more than half of whom receive free or reduced price lunch) had preschool experience. Recognizing the importance of early childhood education in ensuring students are ready to succeed in school and life, we developed the Children’s Village, which includes formal preschool classes and all-day, year-round programming serving children from six weeks to five years old. Today, when a Children’s Village student arrives for the first day of kindergarten, the teacher can say, “This child is ready to learn.”
With early childhood education, students learn more, teachers accomplish more and taxpayers get more for their education tax dollar. But it takes all our students, teachers, staff, administrators, parents and partners to make the Children’s Villages a success. Indeed, it really does take a village to ensure quality early childhood education. Read more
School/District Characteristics
Hot Topics
Blog Roll
- Boardbuzz
- Edwize
- NSDC Reflections
- Advancing the Teaching Profession
- Principals' Office
- Principal's Policy Blog
- ASCA Scene
- The Leading Source
- PDK Blog
- ASBO Intl.'s Economic Recovery Blog
- Always Something
- U.S. Department of Education Blog
- The Core Knowledge Blog
- This Week in Education
- PTA Blog
- Such a Smart Mom
- Eduwonkette
- Teacher Leadership Today
- On the Shoulders of Giants
- Relentless Pursuit of Acronyms
- Teacher in a Strange Land
- Teach Moore
- The Tempered Radical
- TLN Teacher Voices
- The Educated Reporter
- Center for Public Education
- Connect for Kids
- Once Upon a School

But good charter schools
But good charter schools create the right environment for professional development. I don't care how hard you try but you're not going to get people to do professional development right unless you have the right climates and school leadership to begin with. That's why the system itself is in the way of professional development. Get schools into the hands of good charter operators and see professional development flourish. Leave them in the hands of public bureaucrats and see it croak.
And I guarantee you that teachers hate professional development more than anyone.
Anonymous, I'll agree with
Anonymous, I'll agree with you that good charters can create the right environment for p.d. By the same token, bad charters don't. Sounds a lot like traditional public schools. If charter authorizers are compelled and empowered to do their jobs well (as the Obama administration seems to want), strong pd will be part of a strong application. It's not "the system" that's in the way of good pd, it's incoherence in the system that stands against it. The challenge for policymakers is (1.) to understand what strong pd looks like and (2.) create policy structures that encourage it. Otherwise, whether in charters or traditional public schools, strong pd will be an accident rather than the rule. And if we believe charters are the only route to strong pd--which is patently not the case--then we're apparently content to ignore the 95% of public schools that aren't charters.
As for teachers hating pd.... I'm married to a teacher and a friend to many others, and I can tell you that they hate BAD pd. Strong pd, on the other hand, is a completely different story.
Cute baby. Anonymous needs to
Cute baby. Anonymous needs to look over to the right side of this page and click on "What's Working in Your School" if s/he needs evidence that many successful, highly challenged public schools have strong PD programs. Or read about Chets Creek Elementary in Jacksonville FL, a (non-charter) public school that not only models the best kind of PD but exports it via online seminars to nearby universities.
http://timmonstimes.blogspot.com/
Post new comment