Taking the Easy Way Out

Yesterday, education blogger Kevin Carey sharply rebuked people who peddle simplistic solutions to difficult problems schools face:
All of this would be merely aggravating if this kind of sad excuse for policy debate didn't have a real, detrimental impact on the lives of students. When you tell people that large problems can be solved with simplistic, nominally clever policy solutions, you're implicitly raising a question: "If it's so easy, why haven't we done it already?" That in turns breeds cynicism and mistrust, a jaded worldview in which large social problems are either fundamentally unsolvable or hostage to venal politicians who won't do the right thing even though the answer is so obvious that anyone with a lick of common sense can see it. And once you get there, the temptation is strong to throw up your hands and worry about something else.
Carey is scolding Tom Friedman for advocating the particularly silly idea that states could address the dropout problem by making driver's licenses contingent on high school graduation. But his comments have much broader resonance than that. Many in the national media have made a habit of portraying popular new reform ideas as sure-fire strategies for dramatic school improvement. People skeptical of those reforms must therefore be obstructionists and villains. As I've noted before, Jonathan Alter, Nicholas Kristof and David Brooks have pushed this storyline especially aggressively.
As Carey suggests, that story is very dangerous, because it breeds cynicism and disengagement. If we can't use the miracle cure, why then the situation is hopeless! There have been shades of this thinking in national op-eds and articles portraying high-profile reformers as the drop-dead last chance for urban schools. (See, for example, the Washington Post editorial page, which referred to Chancellor Rhee as the "best, perhaps last, hope" for DC Schools.) It's never wise to pin all our hopes on one reformer or a limited set of reform strategies, especially when research on solutions is sparse.
Carey reminds us that tough problems require complex solutions: "The high school dropout problem is serious business. We can do better, if we focus on improved funding, leadership, teachers, curriculum and assessments tied to high standards, alignment with higher education, integration of social services, virtual high schools, and many other things"-like professional development and public engagement. When solutions are so multifaceted, it's harder to tell tales about villains in the way of progress.
There's more than enough responsibility to go around.
Sign up
Sign up for our e-newsletter on public school success.
Become a Facebook fan.
H1N1 FLU RESOURCES
Click here for resources to help the public education community prepare for the unlikely case of a flu pandemic.
Emerging Vision
On this website, educators, parents and policymakers from coast to coast are sharing what's already working in public schools--and sparking a national conversation about how to make it work for children in every school. Join the conversation! Learn more.
Visionaries
Click here to browse dozens of Public School Insights interviews with extraordinary education advocates, including:
New Stories
Featured Story

A Village Route to Early Childhood Education
In the 1990s, we at Davenport Community Schools noticed a trend: Children were coming to kindergarten unprepared to learn. A troublingly low number of our district’s children (more than half of whom receive free or reduced price lunch) had preschool experience. Recognizing the importance of early childhood education in ensuring students are ready to succeed in school and life, we developed the Children’s Village, which includes formal preschool classes and all-day, year-round programming serving children from six weeks to five years old. Today, when a Children’s Village student arrives for the first day of kindergarten, the teacher can say, “This child is ready to learn.”
With early childhood education, students learn more, teachers accomplish more and taxpayers get more for their education tax dollar. But it takes all our students, teachers, staff, administrators, parents and partners to make the Children’s Villages a success. Indeed, it really does take a village to ensure quality early childhood education. Read more
School/District Characteristics
Hot Topics
Blog Roll
- Boardbuzz
- Edwize
- NSDC Reflections
- Advancing the Teaching Profession
- Principals' Office
- Principal's Policy Blog
- ASCA Scene
- The Leading Source
- PDK Blog
- ASBO Intl.'s Economic Recovery Blog
- Always Something
- U.S. Department of Education Blog
- The Core Knowledge Blog
- This Week in Education
- PTA Blog
- Such a Smart Mom
- Eduwonkette
- Teacher Leadership Today
- On the Shoulders of Giants
- Relentless Pursuit of Acronyms
- Teacher in a Strange Land
- Teach Moore
- The Tempered Radical
- TLN Teacher Voices
- The Educated Reporter
- Center for Public Education
- Connect for Kids
- Once Upon a School

I think the idea of having to
I think the idea of having to get high grades to get a driver's license is like getting a license to drink at 14 years old- just silly.
It is OUR JOB as teachers to stay on these kids and get the funding we need for programs or training to put quality curriculum into practice that reaches all of our students. It is also our jobs as teachers to know EACH INDIVIDUAL child and what their strengths and weaknesses are. Praise them and focus on their strengths while building some scaffolding for their weaknesses. Driver's license???
While I understand your
While I understand your objections--the driver's license idea would quickly create far more problems than in would solve--the underlying point seems to be that students greater motivation to stay in school. That principle seems quite sound--and it's the job of educators, families and communities to provide that motivation.
The driver's license idea is mostly a gimmick and a distraction--you're quite right.
Post new comment