The Fragility of Incentive-Based Reforms
Eagle-eyed Alexander Russo spotted the following news item about the Chicago Public Schools: Cash-for-Good-Grades Project Likely Done. Yes, it seems that financial challenges will force CPS to stop paying students for grades. There’s a lesson here about the fragility of incentive-based reforms.
The more successful cash-for-performance projects are, the more expensive they become. When they rely on unreliable funding sources such as foundations or wealthy donors, they live on borrowed time.
Incentive programs like the controversial money-for-grades initiatives rise and fall on messages they send about priorities. Critics believe they send the wrong messages about school performance, while supporters have pointed to evidence that they boost student grades. What happens when students who have grown accustomed to the $100 “A” find out that adults have stopped funding the program—for whatever reason?
As we create incentive programs for students and educators alike, let’s be sure we can fund them for success.
Sign up
Sign up for our e-newsletter on public school success.
Become a Facebook fan.
H1N1 FLU RESOURCES
Click here for resources to help the public education community prepare for the unlikely case of a flu pandemic.
Emerging Vision
On this website, educators, parents and policymakers from coast to coast are sharing what's already working in public schools--and sparking a national conversation about how to make it work for children in every school. Join the conversation! Learn more.
Visionaries
Click here to browse dozens of Public School Insights interviews with extraordinary education advocates, including:
New Stories
Featured Story
A Village Route to Early Childhood Education
In the 1990s, we at Davenport Community Schools noticed a trend: Children were coming to kindergarten unprepared to learn. A troublingly low number of our district’s children (more than half of whom receive free or reduced price lunch) had preschool experience. Recognizing the importance of early childhood education in ensuring students are ready to succeed in school and life, we developed the Children’s Village, which includes formal preschool classes and all-day, year-round programming serving children from six weeks to five years old. Today, when a Children’s Village student arrives for the first day of kindergarten, the teacher can say, “This child is ready to learn.”
With early childhood education, students learn more, teachers accomplish more and taxpayers get more for their education tax dollar. But it takes all our students, teachers, staff, administrators, parents and partners to make the Children’s Villages a success. Indeed, it really does take a village to ensure quality early childhood education. Read more
School/District Characteristics
Hot Topics
Blog Roll
- Boardbuzz
- Edwize
- NSDC Reflections
- Advancing the Teaching Profession
- Principals' Office
- Principal's Policy Blog
- ASCA Scene
- The Leading Source
- PDK Blog
- ASBO Intl.'s Economic Recovery Blog
- Always Something
- U.S. Department of Education Blog
- The Core Knowledge Blog
- This Week in Education
- PTA Blog
- Such a Smart Mom
- Eduwonkette
- Teacher Leadership Today
- On the Shoulders of Giants
- Relentless Pursuit of Acronyms
- Teacher in a Strange Land
- Teach Moore
- The Tempered Radical
- TLN Teacher Voices
- The Educated Reporter
- Center for Public Education
- Connect for Kids
- Once Upon a School
Actually, for the big
Actually, for the big foundations, the biggest problem with paying students directly is that it might work too well. What if, given their emphasis on accountability, measurement, and return on investment, it turned out that this was the most efficient way for foundations to improve student achievement? Then what?
Would Broad, Gates, etc. be satisfied stepping away from policy, lobbying, funding charters, TFA, Broad Academy etc., and just start disbursing cash to students within the existing public school structures? I think not. Their fundamental business-informed approach would say "yes," but their ideology and, well, desire to have fun jobs, would say "no."
My back of the envelope calculation is that the cost of TFA could provide funding for cash for grades for nearly 1% of the students in the country. Think about that.
Whoops, off a decimal point
Whoops, off a decimal point on my calculation. Make that .1% of students...
Hmm.... We can trade in 1000
Hmm.... We can trade in 1000 TFA's for universal cash rewards? What if all students start doing well? Would we have to go after New Leaders for New Schools?
Let's not forget that Eli Broad is a big fan of the money for grades programs. Many of the current foundations are very interested in incentives (for adults and students alike) and less interested in content or instruction.
Gates, however, has expressed far more interest in promoting better instruction--after their public mea culpa for placing too much stock in the structure of small schools, and too little in what happens in their classrooms.
Post new comment